“The greed of making money and controlling the planet is killing our home. One can have a thriving economy but not at the expense of this earth or any living being on this planet.”
You may wonder why me, a chef is not blogging about food anymore but instead is blogging about global warming.
It is very simple, without this wonderful earth I am nothing and I can not live my dreams and be the chef that I want to be.
I would love to post about all the wonderful chefs in the world, my dishes, ideas and foods I encounter but I feel that might not be a privilege for long if we all dont educate ourselves as fast as possible about our human mistakes and actively change our ways overnight! We need to let the economy collapse for a bit and invest into solutions for the survival of our planet if we are to protect our children and future as well our mother earth.
Global warming and all its possible implications need to be top priority before anything else right now.
Our planet has a natural system and everything in the natural earth has a purpose and keeps life thriving.
We humans unfortunately do not respect this and very clearly the priority of maximum economics is far above nature itself which is going to be fatal for many people planst and animals costing them there lives including your and mine.
The situation gathered about global warming is incredible and frightening however most people are completely oblivious as to how serious all this is.
It should be one of the most important subjects to teach children and part of human education systems world wide and that is a holistic understanding of how the earth works, so no matter if you become a DR or a architect you will have this knowledge and design a human civilisation based on respecting and working with our earths systems as a priority. It should be law that nobody can invade earths recourses or disturb the balance of our planet in any way.
We know solutions already to many of our problems including electricity. I believe there is no reason what so ever to have any nuclear energy or anything else to to with nuclear at all.
We should be at the forefront of any civilisation ever in human history but our behaviour really does not reflect this at all.
Indigenous tribes seemed primitive for centurys to the western worlds however they are the people that have understood the importance of our planet way before we have in this day and age.
Nature will have its own natural shifts that may cause tsunami’s and other natural disasters however under no circumstances should we create any concept on earth that is man made that might contribute to any damages to our natural cycles on earth and provoke a global catastrophe.
“I may seem dramatic however I dont think that In the battle against climate change there is no enemy to fight, just our attitudes.”
Climate Change is not enough on the political and social agenda internationally. Our climate is changing, with industrial production, habitat, transport and everyday human activities acknowledged as causes of global warming.
The Gulf Stream and the Next Ice Age is a one-hour documentary which explores the results of a recent American government report that believes the collapse of thermohaline circulation will take place around the year 2010 and impose a minor ice age on Europe. Could Dublin acquire a climate like Spitzberg, and London like that of Siberia?
The Gulf Stream is a powerful surface current, driven by the Trade Winds. Its origins lie in the Gulf of Mexico and it carries the tropical waters from the Florida Strait to the great banks of the United States, where it heads eastward, carrying its warm waters to the borders of the North Atlantic. As soon as the tropical waters hit the Arctic Ocean, they cool abruptly and plunge towards the abyssal zone to form a loop, known as “thermohaline circulation.” Then, like an immense conveyor belt that slows down in the ocean depths, it sets out again southward to rejoin the beginning of the Gulf Stream.
I hope there are enough people that care that can join in contacting your local authorities and do as much as you can to help to stop man made global warming. I know some scientist have claimed that the global warming is not due to our man made Carbon dioxide (CO2) which is the primary greenhouse gas emitted through human activities etc, however this is not enough evidence to surgest that we should not do nothing! It is better to convert to natural and harmless alternatives just incase. We need to educate ourselves about everything as much as possible listen to all the pros and con ideas for sure however we should not take a luxury debate on this because our planet is what unites all living beings and we must take care as a matter of urgency.
I love life and I care especially for nature and wildlife and human beings that would die. I feel I was not borne to come here to die because of badly designed cooperations that dont want to take care when they are wanting to make maximum profit at innocent peoples and this planets expense. I will be as honest, outspoken and emotional about this subject and I dont mind if people will not respect what I feel but I am really worried and I care, I love this earth and life on earth and I will do my best to fight for it.
Geoengineering could be very dangerous!!
Chemical trials are happening already please read about it, google it inform yourself thoroughly!
The government might resort to desperate measures to adjust the global warming but it is important that we do not do it this way. We must work with the planet and let it adjust naturally after we completely switch off any things that is causing the greenhouse effect. Our societys will be in turmoil but this is easier to cope without electricity and a collapsed economy for a while then an ice age, water levels rising and volcanic eruptions or tsunamis etc etc!
We are not treating the cause by using this method and it is not a longterm solution at all. Nature knows how to balance itself. We can help with natural things, the methods I included are the ones the government dont mind us knowing about be assured there are some even more drastic things that we do not know about until it is to late.
While the real climate solutions are blocked by vested interests seeking big bucks from coal, runways and forest destruction, our government tells us that it is taking “tough decisions” by cosying up to them. The scientist’s focus on tinkering with our entire planetary system is not a dynamic new technological and scientific frontier, but an expression of political despair.
Please study about this it is important that we know what is happening:
Geoengineering is the deliberate and large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climatic system with the aim of reducing global warming. The discipline divides broadly into two categories- carbon dioxide removal and solar radiation management. Carbon dioxide removal addresses a cause of climate change by removing one of the greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. Solar radiation management attempts to offset effects of greenhouse gases by causing the Earth to absorb less solar radiation.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded in 2007 that geoengineering options remained largely unproven.
Geoengineering has been proposed as a potential third option for tackling global warming, alongside mitigation and adaptation. Scientists do not typically suggest geoengineering as an alternative to emissions control, but rather an accompanying strategy. Reviews of geoengineering techniques have emphasised that they are not substitutes for emission controls and have identified potentially stronger and weaker schemes.
There are no known large-scale geoengineering projects except one conducted outside the scientific mainstream by Russ George. Almost all research has consisted of computer modelling or laboratory tests, and attempts to move to real-world experimentation have proved controversial. Some limited tree planting and cool roof projects are already underway. Ocean iron fertilization has been given small-scale research trials. Field research into sulfur aerosols has also started.
Various criticisms have been made of geoengineering and some commentators appear fundamentally opposed. Some have suggested that the concept of geoengineering presents a moral hazard because it could reduce the political and popular pressure for emissions reduction.Groups such as ETC Group and individuals such as Raymond Pierrehumbert have called for a moratorium on deployment and out-of-doors testing of geoengineering techniques. The full effects of various geoengineering schemes are not well understood.
Scientific Research explaining why they are spraying the sky’s around the world. Learn and more importantly do something about the Chemtrails being sprayed. Learn the details here in this short film. UN Environment Program: 200 Species Extinct Every Day, Unlike Anything Since Dinosaurs Disappeared 65 Million Years Ago. According to the UN Environment Program, the Earth is in the midst of a mass extinction of life.
Scientists estimate that 150-200 species of plant, insect, bird and mammal become extinct every 24 hours. This is nearly 1,000 times the “natural” or “background” rate and, say many biologists, is greater than anything the world has experienced since the vanishing of the dinosaurs nearly 65m years ago.
Many people (dis-informed people) were saying they don’t seed or spray the sky’s, and well… all I have to do is look up or look at the documents I have to show these are plain ignorant to facts and data. Maybe they are in denial.
“The Images in this video show jets airliners and equipment used for jets airliners. No implied meaning other than “airliner” equipment is intended. For example: the tanks shown in this video represent “water” tanks and may or may not contain any other known chemical other than water. Any images shown in this video are part of the public domain available on the world wide web, and constitute no other rights implied or suggested. This video is for intended for learning purposes and may contain facts unaware to the general public.
The concept of geoengineering has two meanings: The science of measuring and modelling the earth for applications within civil engineering, climate engineering, climate remediation, and climate intervention.
Geoengineering is commonly taken to mean the deliberate large-scale manipulation of the planetary environment to counteract anthropogenic climate change.
Geoengineering is distinct from large-scale environmental damage and accidental anthropogenic climate change, which are side-effects of human activity, rather than an intended consequence. Definitions of the term are not universally accepted. The global extraction of hydrocarbons from the sub-surface using integrated geoscience and engineering technology has been termed ‘petroleum geoengineering’ as an activity with global impact. The Oxford English Dictionary defines geoengineering as “the deliberate large-scale manipulation of an environmental process that affects the earth’s climate, in an attempt to counteract the effects of global warming.”
The techniques themselves may cause significant foreseen or unforeseen harm. For example, the use of reflective balloons may result in significant litter, which may be harmful to wildlife.
Ozone depletion is a risk of some geoengineering techniques, notably those involving sulfur delivery into the stratosphere.
The active nature of geoengineering may in some cases create a clear division between winners and losers. Most of the proposed interventions are regional, such as albedo modification in the Arctic.
There may be unintended climatic consequences, such as changes to the hydrological cycle including droughts or floods, caused by the geoengineering techniques, but possibly not predicted by the models used to plan them. Such effects may be cumulative or chaotic in nature, making prediction and control very difficult.